The more you're telling him he's wrong, the likelier it is to strengthen his resolve and make him stick to his beliefs. It's one thing for him to be told things which firstly he doesn't know and secondly he thinks he knows but doesn't, and it's another to tell him what you believe and let him come to whatever realization you want him to come to, on his own. Telling someone how something really is without holding a position of authority over them is almost always a lost cause because they'll most likely start to look for, or make up out of whole cloth, reasons and explanations for why you're wrong instead of rationalizing whether or not they themselves have been.
Does anyone know why she didn't go through with the book signing? Some more info on that would be great, as the vibe here seems to point to her just screwing her fans for no reason whatsoever.
Maybe one of her kids got really sick so she had to rush home, or maybe she just didn't feel like it tonight and hadn't been made aware of how big of a deal this was to the people who support her. Maybe she did want to do the signing but her handlers messed it up somehow. I just don't feel comfortable blaming everything on Palin with no knowledge of what really happened, just because it's Palin.
It seems like you guys are arguing somewhat different things here, which may be why this exchange has turned a bit sour.
Reading Blankfist's posts, it appears he's arguing that in this specific case the restaurant was in the right. Seeing as how the extra charge was clearly made known to these customers well before they ordered their meal, I'm 100% in agreement that they're liable to pay their bill, regardless of the service they received. However, what Gwiz seemed to be arguing is the theoretical scenario in which a restaurant adds a charge without telling the customer beforehand, effectively tricking the customer into a situation where they have to pay more than was advertised and therefore not giving the customer the chance to take their business elsewhere. If I got that right I'm in 100% agreement with Gwiz aswell.
The key word here is communication. A restaurant has the right to add whatever charge it likes, aswell as raise their prices as much as they like. I've no problem with paying an extra 18%, so long as the restaurant has made it clear that this is their practice. This can be done with a note in their menu, a few words from a staff member or whatever. Knowing that there is an extra 18% charge on top of the total price gives the customer the opportunity to decide whether or not to eat there. But getting a table, ordering the food, eating it and getting the bill before finding out this extra expenditure is not acceptable business practice in my opinion.
Didn't find him that funny, so I understand the audience reaction. Not sure if that's enough of a reason to constitute a downvote though, so will just abstain from voting on it.
Downvote for misrepresenting my royal house. I'm a staunch defender of our royalty, and this (perhaps unintentional) depiction of the king as being less-than-respectful couldn't be further from the truth.
Do you know how many time they meet and shake hands in front of the camera like that? Well I can tell you it's enough times to warrant an initial bow, followed only by subsequent handshakes. You can definately find a picture where the emperor and my king bow to eachother, garantueed! Also, some of these heads of state have spent everything from a few years to several decades in events together. As I understand it, bowing is oftentimes more of a formal greeting for people introducing themselves to each other. Is that wrong?
As we've so clearly seen in this slideshow, if your agenda is to paint someone up as being more humble than the rest and at the same time try to equate that trait as something negative, then there's more than enough of a selection of pictures to choose from.
I don't find Letterman funny in the laughing out loud-sense, but his skits are almost always in good taste and form. This is a prime example of just that. Highly entertaining!
If the commercial is in the video embed posted here then it must be considered part of the video, yes? If that's the case, shouldn't your aversion to commercials be taken into consideration? It's a part of the video, and since we're supposed to vote based on the video as a whole, it would only make sense to do it in this regard aswell.
The vote shouldn't necessarily have to take into consideration anything but the content and quality of the video. So whether or not some hosting site needs revenue streams or whatever is irrelevant to the vote itself. Looking at it from that perspective, it's basically the same reasoning as with the downvoting on blocked videos. All the blocked people can see is a black screen, and that's neither fun nor interesting to watch.
I guess it can be considered a cereal, just like porridge. In everyday speech however, one generally refers to porridge and muesli specifically when describing ones breakfast.
Looks like müsli/muesli, what with the fruit and all. We could ask them just to be sure, if for nothing else then to finally answer the age old question on which kind of breakfast is best suited for a career in music!
The older video is the original and the newer is the dupe. If the sifter of the older video wants though, he/she could update their sift with the better quality video. That should be a good enough solution, shouldn't it?
NinjaBread Man Video Review
Zero Punctuation - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
2.5 Minutes of Avatar - Chase Sequence
Converting a Young Earth Preacher to Atheism (Blog Entry by dag)
Palin Screws Her Stupid Fans
Maybe one of her kids got really sick so she had to rush home, or maybe she just didn't feel like it tonight and hadn't been made aware of how big of a deal this was to the people who support her. Maybe she did want to do the signing but her handlers messed it up somehow. I just don't feel comfortable blaming everything on Palin with no knowledge of what really happened, just because it's Palin.
Couple Arrested for Not Paying Tip
Reading Blankfist's posts, it appears he's arguing that in this specific case the restaurant was in the right. Seeing as how the extra charge was clearly made known to these customers well before they ordered their meal, I'm 100% in agreement that they're liable to pay their bill, regardless of the service they received.
However, what Gwiz seemed to be arguing is the theoretical scenario in which a restaurant adds a charge without telling the customer beforehand, effectively tricking the customer into a situation where they have to pay more than was advertised and therefore not giving the customer the chance to take their business elsewhere. If I got that right I'm in 100% agreement with Gwiz aswell.
The key word here is communication. A restaurant has the right to add whatever charge it likes, aswell as raise their prices as much as they like. I've no problem with paying an extra 18%, so long as the restaurant has made it clear that this is their practice. This can be done with a note in their menu, a few words from a staff member or whatever. Knowing that there is an extra 18% charge on top of the total price gives the customer the opportunity to decide whether or not to eat there. But getting a table, ordering the food, eating it and getting the bill before finding out this extra expenditure is not acceptable business practice in my opinion.
Jimmy Carr: Audience doesn't "get it" on The Late Late Show
Zero Punctuation: Dragon Age: Origins
Obama Bows to Japanese Emperor Akihito
Do you know how many time they meet and shake hands in front of the camera like that? Well I can tell you it's enough times to warrant an initial bow, followed only by subsequent handshakes. You can definately find a picture where the emperor and my king bow to eachother, garantueed! Also, some of these heads of state have spent everything from a few years to several decades in events together. As I understand it, bowing is oftentimes more of a formal greeting for people introducing themselves to each other. Is that wrong?
As we've so clearly seen in this slideshow, if your agenda is to paint someone up as being more humble than the rest and at the same time try to equate that trait as something negative, then there's more than enough of a selection of pictures to choose from.
David Letterman's Favorite Actor
Truther Proves 9/11 was an inside job with a $20 bill
Would it be bad form... (Terrible Talk Post)
The vote shouldn't necessarily have to take into consideration anything but the content and quality of the video. So whether or not some hosting site needs revenue streams or whatever is irrelevant to the vote itself. Looking at it from that perspective, it's basically the same reasoning as with the downvoting on blocked videos. All the blocked people can see is a black screen, and that's neither fun nor interesting to watch.
16 yr old has ridiculously simple idea, makes $$$
Upcoming Sift Interview: Pomplamoose (Music Talk Post)
Pomplamoose covers Mister Sandman by The Chordettes
Upcoming Sift Interview: Pomplamoose (Music Talk Post)
Little Belgian Boy Salutes Canadian Troops
Dupes on a soccer video... (Sports Talk Post)
Let's get to the point: Boobs. Inflatable boobs.
http://www.videosift.com/video/Japan-s-take-on-the-push-up-bra
If you get the joke in this, it probably means you are old